A Shift in Definition: Recession or Not?

The definition of a recession has been a topic of debate lately, with some experts emphasizing two consecutive quarters of falling GDP as the determining factor. This new interpretation, however, contradicts the traditional understanding of a recession and ignores other important markers of economic health.

In recent days, unregistered Wikipedia users made significant changes to the online encyclopedia's definition of a recession, highlighting a narrowed definition that focuses solely on negative GDP growth. This shift in perspective has sparked controversy among economists and policymakers alike.

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) defines a recession as 'a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts more than a few months.' This traditional understanding is supported by top Biden officials, who have emphasized that job growth and other indicators suggest a strong economy despite recent negative GDP numbers.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and President Biden himself have avoided using the term 'recession' to describe the current economic situation. Instead, they point to low unemployment rates, record job growth, and foreign business investment as evidence of a robust economy.

The debate surrounding the definition of a recession highlights the complexity and nuance involved in understanding economic trends. While two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth may be one indicator of a recession, it is not the only factor that should be considered. As experts continue to analyze and interpret economic data, it is essential to remember that there is no single definition or formula for determining when an economy is experiencing a recession.

Another word for previous version